sanprabhu
07-27 05:48 PM
I am not sure if non-citizen, non-PR person can contribute to the campaign's of the federal office candidates.
wallpaper lab golden retriever mix
EB3June03
06-28 12:06 AM
Folks,
I want to find out if the remarks section of the I-693 form should be filled in by the civil surgeon for applicant who has LTBI and according to CDC is recommended to go for Evaluation for Treatment for TB.
From USCIS website:-
USCIS - Questions & Answers:<br>Changes to the Tuberculosis and Vaccination Requirements Required for Adjustment of Status (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=1758d5b07655b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=da3eaca797e63110VgnVCM1000004718190a RCRD)
Q: Both the CDC and USCIS have revised their requirements for medical referrals, as notated on Form I-693. In what instances must the referral section in Part 3 be completed?
Only complete Part 3, Referral to Health Department or Other Doctor / Facility, if the referral was required, such as when a Class A condition is suspected and needs further evaluation. Do not complete Part 3 if the referral was merely recommended by the CDC. Instead notate the (recommended but not required) referral in the Remarks box under that particular disease or disorder. This will help alleviate the possibility of USCIS rejecting the Form I-693 due to an erroneous assumption that a follow-up evaluation was needed before completion of the form
I know the Part 3 should NOT be filled by the civil surgeon if the applicant has Class B latent TB. (PPD positive) AND X Rays clear of any Active TB.
If the remarks section is NOT filled in, would there be any problems? Civil surgeon has marked Part 2 with Skin test positive and the size of the induration. Also, he has marked the X Rays normal but he has NOT filled in the Remarks section. I hope that is OK.
I want to find out if the remarks section of the I-693 form should be filled in by the civil surgeon for applicant who has LTBI and according to CDC is recommended to go for Evaluation for Treatment for TB.
From USCIS website:-
USCIS - Questions & Answers:<br>Changes to the Tuberculosis and Vaccination Requirements Required for Adjustment of Status (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=1758d5b07655b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=da3eaca797e63110VgnVCM1000004718190a RCRD)
Q: Both the CDC and USCIS have revised their requirements for medical referrals, as notated on Form I-693. In what instances must the referral section in Part 3 be completed?
Only complete Part 3, Referral to Health Department or Other Doctor / Facility, if the referral was required, such as when a Class A condition is suspected and needs further evaluation. Do not complete Part 3 if the referral was merely recommended by the CDC. Instead notate the (recommended but not required) referral in the Remarks box under that particular disease or disorder. This will help alleviate the possibility of USCIS rejecting the Form I-693 due to an erroneous assumption that a follow-up evaluation was needed before completion of the form
I know the Part 3 should NOT be filled by the civil surgeon if the applicant has Class B latent TB. (PPD positive) AND X Rays clear of any Active TB.
If the remarks section is NOT filled in, would there be any problems? Civil surgeon has marked Part 2 with Skin test positive and the size of the induration. Also, he has marked the X Rays normal but he has NOT filled in the Remarks section. I hope that is OK.
GC_ASP
09-25 11:22 AM
I tried to find the thread posted by PAPPU on ability to pay. Could some one help me with this?
PAPPU:long time back I had posted something on ability to pay. look into the archives. Are you currently employed with this company?what is your current wage? what is the size of the company? how long has the company been in business? what has been the income in the past few years? how much cash do they have in bank? Do they have any external funding? how well do you know the owner? How many people have filed for GC in your company?
Ability to pay is a complicated issue to be answered without knowing all the details. Remember all the data needs to be fully legal (your small time employer should not be saving taxes by using tactics that help him financially but are not right thing to do) and correct and your employer should be willing to help you with all the information. This issue is not difficult to solve. With the help of a good lawyer who knows about the intricacies of ability to pay and takes active interest in your case and a good experienced CPA you can easily overcome it.
PAPPU:long time back I had posted something on ability to pay. look into the archives. Are you currently employed with this company?what is your current wage? what is the size of the company? how long has the company been in business? what has been the income in the past few years? how much cash do they have in bank? Do they have any external funding? how well do you know the owner? How many people have filed for GC in your company?
Ability to pay is a complicated issue to be answered without knowing all the details. Remember all the data needs to be fully legal (your small time employer should not be saving taxes by using tactics that help him financially but are not right thing to do) and correct and your employer should be willing to help you with all the information. This issue is not difficult to solve. With the help of a good lawyer who knows about the intricacies of ability to pay and takes active interest in your case and a good experienced CPA you can easily overcome it.
2011 retriever mix puppies.
glus
01-19 12:59 PM
Can you provide more information? What did they tell you at walk-in?
more...
CRAZYMONK
12-14 02:56 PM
Even though your end client is not the direct client for your employer, they might have used the laguage in the non-compete which reflects the scenario. So check your non-compete document.
May be the final verdict is in favour, you need to take so much of pain in the whole processes. If you prepare for these upfront you can go a head and fight. I had seen couple of instances in the NY, with my friends, where non-compete became VOID.
May be the final verdict is in favour, you need to take so much of pain in the whole processes. If you prepare for these upfront you can go a head and fight. I had seen couple of instances in the NY, with my friends, where non-compete became VOID.
fromnaija
09-08 11:57 AM
Reduce the employment-based immigration backlog — DHS QHSR Discussions (http://www.homelandsecuritydialogue.org/dialogue2/immigration/ideas/reduce-the-employment-based-immigration-backlog)
more...
parsu
02-02 08:27 PM
Should not be a problem. I used Cobra while I am on H1 and changed the Employer.
2010 Golden Retriever attack:
mambarg
09-20 05:32 PM
AFter FP, the LUD is because, during FP, they pull up the records or update the record with your Photo and signatures etc.
Name check is initiated after Notice is generated on ND. So it is seperate from FP.
FP response, not sure what happens when it comes back.
Name check is initiated after Notice is generated on ND. So it is seperate from FP.
FP response, not sure what happens when it comes back.
more...
h1techSlave
03-28 11:02 AM
I have started a thread with similar message. Giving GCs to us means atleast another 10,000 home purchases = $3 billion. A few people here supported that idea, a few vehemently opposed and few was kind of neutral.
Worth pursuing in my opinion.
I am suggesting we should write to White House and to the Ben Bernanke in Mass and draw their attention towards a million people waiting for their green cards, logically they should have already got it(10 years waiting is illogical) but if USCIS use Visa recapture these people can get green cards and green cards to these people means a million new house buyers in the market new cars buyers etc etc. Everybody is going to get green card one day, why not now..That will help bail out the housing market. I'm sure it'll strike a cord with the lawmakers as it will benefit them politically....
Worth pursuing in my opinion.
I am suggesting we should write to White House and to the Ben Bernanke in Mass and draw their attention towards a million people waiting for their green cards, logically they should have already got it(10 years waiting is illogical) but if USCIS use Visa recapture these people can get green cards and green cards to these people means a million new house buyers in the market new cars buyers etc etc. Everybody is going to get green card one day, why not now..That will help bail out the housing market. I'm sure it'll strike a cord with the lawmakers as it will benefit them politically....
hair 2010 Golden Retriever Mix
sdrblr
10-19 10:15 AM
US is a sovereign country and Govt of India cannot say what to do and how to handle the immigration issues. Hell GOI cannot handle its own immigration issue on the eastern border :)
More over the big Indian IT companies lose employees (read as revenue) if they lobby for GC.
More over the big Indian IT companies lose employees (read as revenue) if they lobby for GC.
more...
Mahatma
06-19 02:20 PM
Dear IVians,
Thanks for your response!
Information referred to was very neat. Pretty much I have decided to not send original passports BUT instead notarized copies.
It was a good call indeed!
It is ironic that our embassy/consulate is not quite upto our expectations.
Things don't change as quickly.
This info. was very crucial. Thanks again.
Thanks for your response!
Information referred to was very neat. Pretty much I have decided to not send original passports BUT instead notarized copies.
It was a good call indeed!
It is ironic that our embassy/consulate is not quite upto our expectations.
Things don't change as quickly.
This info. was very crucial. Thanks again.
hot golden retriever,
hariswaminathan
07-31 02:30 PM
Hi,
We had been to Canada in Sep, 2003 for our Canadian residency stamping. While on our way back to San Francisco, US immigration did not stamp our passports or take back our I-94's. Prior to this trip we had been to India in March, 2003.
Now I am confused as to what should be our last date/port of entry to US? I-94's/passport stamp still indicates our March, 2003 trip and Our Canadian PR stamp does indicate date PR was stamped in Canada. But there's not other stamp/proof on passport for our entry to San Francisco.
Any pointers/suggestions?
Thanks
Travel to contiguous territory such as Canada for a period of 30 days or less does not count as last Port of entry because they dont take your I-94 or stamp your passport. Therefore you have to put your Prior trip of March 2003.
We had been to Canada in Sep, 2003 for our Canadian residency stamping. While on our way back to San Francisco, US immigration did not stamp our passports or take back our I-94's. Prior to this trip we had been to India in March, 2003.
Now I am confused as to what should be our last date/port of entry to US? I-94's/passport stamp still indicates our March, 2003 trip and Our Canadian PR stamp does indicate date PR was stamped in Canada. But there's not other stamp/proof on passport for our entry to San Francisco.
Any pointers/suggestions?
Thanks
Travel to contiguous territory such as Canada for a period of 30 days or less does not count as last Port of entry because they dont take your I-94 or stamp your passport. Therefore you have to put your Prior trip of March 2003.
more...
house Golden Retriever mix lives
ck_b2001
07-02 02:04 PM
Guys,
Making all EB visas current was not the right decision in the first place. That will just shift the backlog from one side to another. The only good thing was interim EAD and AP. When the visa bulletin will come out in mid Sep for FY2008 it will not be too bad provided they have already adjucated 60,000 cases in Jun and would be willing to accept more cases. The dates had already moved quite ahead in Jun 07. In Oct it may turnout to be "C" for some categories and show significant movement for others.
I hope we can still use our current medicals provided it is no later than on yr. we may have to sign the documents again with new sign date.
I am devastated myself but thats all we can do at this point. i really dont think lawsuit will do any good. uscis knows what they were doing. Though all this may help in creating a momentum for CIR, Skill Bill once again.
Making all EB visas current was not the right decision in the first place. That will just shift the backlog from one side to another. The only good thing was interim EAD and AP. When the visa bulletin will come out in mid Sep for FY2008 it will not be too bad provided they have already adjucated 60,000 cases in Jun and would be willing to accept more cases. The dates had already moved quite ahead in Jun 07. In Oct it may turnout to be "C" for some categories and show significant movement for others.
I hope we can still use our current medicals provided it is no later than on yr. we may have to sign the documents again with new sign date.
I am devastated myself but thats all we can do at this point. i really dont think lawsuit will do any good. uscis knows what they were doing. Though all this may help in creating a momentum for CIR, Skill Bill once again.
tattoo golden retriever mixed with
deepimpact
08-16 02:38 PM
I travelled via Frankfurt with a valid I-797 and without a current H1B visa stamp (was going to India for my 1st stamping) last year. I had confirmed with the German Counsulate in US that as long I have valid I-797 I don't need a transit visa.
more...
pictures mix of Golden retriever or
raj3078
01-14 05:53 PM
it seems that they are already married for 2 yrs....In that case she would get 10 yr GC.... The best scenario is that she should wait till she gets the card and then take whatever action she wishes to take
dresses girlfriend Golden Retriever
gs77
08-17 10:24 PM
Hi,
I looked at different forums. But I could not locate a definite answer for my questions.
I have H1. My wife has H4. Both will expire in 11/2009. I don't have stamp
but she has stamp. We both used AP to enter into USA recently. We did not use our EAD.
Questions on EAD paper filing :
14) Manner of Last Entry into the U.S. ?
15) Current Immigration status ?
I believe that the answer to the question 14 should be PAROLEE or Advance Porole. How about question 15 ?
The immigration officer put 'Conditions: AOS DA' in our AP and new I-94 both. What will be the answer, AOS Pending or H1B/H4 ?
Please share your experience. Thanks in advance.
I looked at different forums. But I could not locate a definite answer for my questions.
I have H1. My wife has H4. Both will expire in 11/2009. I don't have stamp
but she has stamp. We both used AP to enter into USA recently. We did not use our EAD.
Questions on EAD paper filing :
14) Manner of Last Entry into the U.S. ?
15) Current Immigration status ?
I believe that the answer to the question 14 should be PAROLEE or Advance Porole. How about question 15 ?
The immigration officer put 'Conditions: AOS DA' in our AP and new I-94 both. What will be the answer, AOS Pending or H1B/H4 ?
Please share your experience. Thanks in advance.
more...
makeup of pit-bull mix puppies.
rajmirk
07-20 01:00 PM
Rule 1: Life is not fair -- get used to it!
- From Bill Gates' 11 Rules of Life
I wouldn't say Gates is a loser, but whoever really believes this is one.
- From Bill Gates' 11 Rules of Life
I wouldn't say Gates is a loser, but whoever really believes this is one.
girlfriend golden retriever mixed with
kirupa
05-16 02:14 PM
Added all four of your nice stamps up :beam:
hairstyles golden retriever mix puppies.
sbmallik
11-12 09:11 AM
I-140 belongs to the employer only, so it is up-to them to disclose the details. Unless you change employer without using AC21 clause, I-140 details won't be necessary.
kaisersose
07-18 08:02 AM
I just read this line from the USCIS release
===
USCIS�s announcement today allows anyone who was eligible to apply under Visa Bulletin No. 107 a full month�s time to do so.
====
It appears Labors approved after July 31 cannot apply for 485 as they would not have been eligible under bulletin No. 107.
if yes, then this is something that should be clearly mentioned somewhere.
===
USCIS�s announcement today allows anyone who was eligible to apply under Visa Bulletin No. 107 a full month�s time to do so.
====
It appears Labors approved after July 31 cannot apply for 485 as they would not have been eligible under bulletin No. 107.
if yes, then this is something that should be clearly mentioned somewhere.
meimmi
06-05 01:07 PM
You can get a licence valid upto 6 moinths from the date of H1 receipt notice. You can go to Wayne Rt 23 MVC. I got it myself last year from there.